Eilon, August 14, 2004
Hello friends
I came across this story, while "researching" information for any
possible story-descriptive, filled with sentiment and informative as
well. The photo was taken in the late 19th cent Gerritsen's Mill. The
site of this story is not too far from my old neighborhood, whose
southern extremities consisted of vacant lots and marshland. I came
across this article looking for more information on a maze of creeks
that converged about a half-mile south of my bedroom window. In the
1950s NewYork's sanitation department built a large smoke stacked
structure in the midst of what the author describes as
phragmites-apparently reed like plants that invested the marsh. The
creeks are Betts, Spring and Ralph Creek. Just south of the sanitation
or incinerater they unite into the mythic estuarine Old Mill Creek that
drains into Jamaica Bay. It is possible for anyone who has arrived in
New York and traveled west on Brooklyn's Belt Parkway to see this
structure, stolid in the swaying rushes on the northside of the
highway.-Barry
The Lost Creek
by Thomas J. Campanella
When we return to the scene of our childhood, not only the
landscape has changed, but the way we see it.
— Yi-Fu Tuan
I grew up on a typical Brooklyn city block, with London planetrees,
manicured front lawns and chaste brick homes. Our neighbor, Mr.
Berkowitz, an old man even in my earliest memories, shared a driveway
with us, and the alley between our houses was common ground between this
octogenarian and my brother and I. Berkowitz was something of a legend
among local children. We didn't know much about the man, except that he
had the best back yard in the neighborhood known as the Jungle.
In spite of its modest size, this unkempt patch of earth bred many wild
things, and we were its lords. Amidst the milkweed and rosa rugosa
prowled feral cats, which the neighborhood dogs occasionally sent
scurrying into the bush. Squirrels—game for our paper clip
missiles—nested in the Jungle's twiggy bosom, as did an abandoned pet
turtle and frogs from summer vacations.
The Jungle also had its secrets. Wiffleballs, balsa-wood airplanes,
Frisbees and tools lifted from Dad's shop were among its lost victims.
The buzzing greenery had a way of making things disappear, confiscating
all within reach of its viney tentacles. We would hide evidence of
childhood transgressions in the Jungle—Mom's broken dish, a bottle of
beer, a dog-eared copy of Playboy—each banished to the wilderness like
the scapegoats of ancient Israel, carrying the sins of men.
Thoreau observed that the "merest child which has rambled into a
copsewood dreams of a wilderness so wild and strange and inexhaustible
as nature can never show him." To us, Berkowitz's Jungle was a token of
mighty wilderness. In that tiny space was the Amazon and Alaska and the
Everglades. There, time ground to a halt; the order of adulthood
faltered and the world of kids and nature took a final stand.
Of the Jungle's greatest mystery, however, we learned through a tale
told to us one summer night by the light of a citronella candle. Our
Virgil was Berkowitz.
Deep within the Jungle's thickets there once snaked a Creek. Long ago,
its waters carried the Indian and the explorer and the first Dutch
farmers deep into the land now called Brooklyn. Berkowitz never divulged
the source or purpose of its waters. But he had indeed seen it, years
ago, out there beyond the clotheslines and lot lines, when he and his
city were younger. The Creek flowed in both directions, he told us, and
on its banks once stood a mill.
We decided that this Creek must be found. We became Livingstone and
Stanley, determined to come upon the headwaters of our Nile. Our
imaginations took us father than our feet, and we wove an entire
landscape from the old man's threads; the Creek came slowly to life in
our minds. We imagined it curling darkly through the reeds, and saw
herons stalking its dusky flats; an owl swooped across waters silvered
by the moon. The shallows boiled with fish, the shores bloomed with
phragmites . We could almost hear the muted suck of the tide-soaked sand.
But we never found the phantom waterway, and in time its legend faded.
Theories of its whereabouts unraveled and the whole quest was soon
tossed aside like a toy. Septembers came and went; new worlds were set
for our discovery. Berkowitz died, and his house was sold. The new
people tore out the Jungle and replaced it with a bed of concrete,
tinted green.
By this time, however, we already found another childhood landscape.
Down along Avenue U, several blocks from our house was a vast space
tailored perfectly for restless city kids. A scruffy domain of marshes
and scrawny trees, this was the undeveloped section of Marine Park, and
through it passed a sluggish waterway known as Gerritsen Inlet. Here,
between the tides and the junked cars, we played, fought, laughed, and
cried—in short, grew up.
The low-slung southern reaches of Brooklyn and Queens were once
intimately joined to the sea, known long ago as
Savanehachee—"sea-indented savanna." The rolling outwash plain here was
formed by meltwater from glacial ice fields to the north. Protected from
the Atlantic by the sandy barrier of Rockaway Peninsula, Jamaica Bay
slowly took form, and shallow estuaries desiccated the green mantle of
its marshland. Once reaching far inland from the sea, these littoral
fingers have, over the years, been bulkheaded and dredged. Warehouses
and marinas line their banks, an occasional fishing trawler, and rows of
homes with backyard docks.
Of these, Gerritsen Inlet has a particularly long history. It was known
to the native Canarsee Indians as Weywitsprittner; to the early Dutch as
the Stromme Kill. Fed by upland streams, its brackish waters supported a
wide variety of life. Oysters, sturgeon, striped bass and crabs were
harvested by the Canarsee Indians, and the surrounding land yielded deer
and fowl. Weywitsprittner provided well for its original inhabitants;
archeological deposits—of shells, bones and other artifacts—suggest
occupation as far back as a thousand years.
With the coming of the Dutch, the Stromme Kill facilitated exploration
and settlement. Several years after Hendrik Hudson's famed voyage in
1609, Adriaen Block made a series of probes into the region's waterways.
Block returned to Holland in 1614, but he left his crew in charge of
another ship, the Restless, one of the first colonial vessels built in
the New World. As documented by Frederick Van Wyck in Keskachauge, their
orders were to search out "new countries, havens, bays and rivers." The
crew settled down that winter to engage in trade, and their base was
likely on the Stromme Kill, close to the nearby Canarsee village of
Keskaechqueren.
The Stromme Kill and adjacent waters soon became known for its wampum,
cylindrical purple and white beads drilled from shells. Wampum was
prized by the Indians and used by the Europeans as currency in exchange
for beaver pelts. The abundant supply of wampum in the area led to the
selection of Keskaechqueren as the earliest permanent European
settlement on Long Island. By 1624 this community was known as Nieuw
Amersfoort, named after a city in Holland. The region was slowly
populated by Dutch bouwers, who raised livestock and cultivated maize,
squash, beans, and tobacco. By the time the English renamed the area New
York, New Amersfort—now Flatlands—had evolved into a gentle pastoral
landscape.
In 1679 Jasper Dankers and Peter Sluyter of Holland toured the
countryside of southwestern Long Island, and recorded their observations
in A Journal of a Voyage to New York. Crossing a "low flat land . . .
overflown at every tide," the men were reminded of their native
Netherlands. They took note of estuaries "navigable and very serviceable
for fisheries," and at last came upon the Stromme Kill. There, Dankers
and Sluyter noted with pleasure a worthy improvement: a tidal mill,
built on the western shore, "driven by . . . water which they dam up."
Gerritsen Creek, Tidal mill in the late nineteenth century.
Photo by P. Ross, courtesy A History of Long Island, 1903.
"They" were the hardy Gerritsen clan, among the first European settlers
in the region. According to Teunis Bergen's Register of the Early
Settlers of Kings County (1881), the Gerritsens had for many years
"owned a farm and the tide-mill . . . on the Strome Kil." The Gerritsens
built their industrial plant in the early seventeenth century, and it
operated continuously until the 1890's. Zimiles, in Early American
Mills, suggests it was one of the first tide-powered mills in North
America. A dam was constructed across a narrow neck of the Kill. A set
of floodgates allowed the incoming water to enter, but slammed shut as
the tide reversed. The pent-up waters, controlled by a sluice gate, were
directed past the mill wheel, driving the wooden gears, shafts and
millstones. Legends grew up around Gerritsen's mill, one of which
suggests that George Washington used it to grind flour for his troops.
After their defeat at the Battle of Long Island, the mill was disabled
so that the British would find it inoperable.
Turn of the century photographs depict an ungainly but noble structure
towering over the mud flats. Though the mill's historical value was
recognized by many, little was done in later years to assure its
survival. Mayor Jimmy "Beau James" Walker was dragged down from
Manhattan to see firsthand the relic, but denounced it a chicken coop.
The mill's long tenure in the salt marsh ended on a September night in
1935, when the edifice was reduced to ashes by an arsonist.
The landscape in which the mill stood for three centuries proved more
durable. It withstood at least one Brobdingnagian scheme for an
industrial ship terminal in Jamaica Bay, the scale of which, reported
Robert Moses in The Future of Jamaica Bay, would have been greater "than
the combined ports of Liverpool, Rotterdam and Hamburg."
Other schemes were more reasoned but no less ambitious. The Gerritsen
estuary's potential as park land was recognized by city planners and
landscape architects. Daniel Burnham recommended that it be set aside to
accommodate the southward march of the metropolis, as a littoral
complement to Prospect Park. In the early 1930s Charles D. Lay, a
prominent New York landscape architect, proposed a grand civic space for
Gerritsen inlet. In a piece entitled "Free Rein, Clean Slate," the New
York Times favorable compared Lay's "formidable, fascinating task" to
the building of Central Park. Olmsted, the article suggested, had
"plastic materials all at hand," whereas Lay had to work with a
wasteland of "strand . . . marsh, bayou and lagoon." What would he come
up with? "We need not expect," asserted the Times, "even a hint of the
grandiose clipped melodrama of Tivoli's Villa d'Este, the picturesque
Baroque of Frascati, Como or Isola Bella. Here will bloom no fabulous
Babylonian hanging garden. Versailles? That is, indeed, a thought . . ."
And Versailles it was, a 1,500 acre plebeian pleasure ground tucked into
Brooklyn's southern shore. Rendered in oil on a massive canvass, the
park would have been among the largest in America if built. The January
1933 issue of Architectural Record listed its many features: yacht
basin, 500 foot wide canal, half-mile wide "big pond," menagerie,
bowling greens, music grove, an open-air theater, and a stadium for
125,000 spectators, served by a new subway line.
Though Robert Moses scrapped this extravagant proposal, he also had
recreation in mind. Robert Caro, in The Powerbroker, suggests that Moses
saw in the estuaries of Jamaica Bay the "greatest of all urban
waterfront parks," as well as the potential crowning achievement of his
long career in park building. "Here in Jamaica Bay," he wrote in The
Future of Jamaica Bay, "lies the opportunity for a place . . . where the
strain of our city life can be relieved, where the nerves of tired
workers may be soothed."
The prospect of a such a vast new amenity spurred a flurry of real
estate speculation in the surrounding area, although only a small
fragment of Moses' dream-park was ever constructed. Well into the
twentieth century the tidal inlet remained little changed. Other grand
proposals came and went, some of which were even more ambitious than
Lay's. Elliot Willensky, in his hometown reverie When Brooklyn was the
World, tells of one politician who suggested the Gerritsen marshes be
the site of a world's fair commemorating Washington's 200th birthday.
But the greatest transformation of the ancient Weywitsprittner came,
oddly, with the 1934 prohibition of offshore dumping by the city. The
alternative recipient was the "wasteland" of New York's tidal estuaries,
and Gerritsen's Inlet received a lion's share. Eventually the entire
east side of the waterway was covered by eight feet of fill. On top of
the trash, millions of cubic yards of fine white sand were pumped as a
slurry from Rockaway Inlet. The filling operations violently changed the
ecology of the salt marsh, resulting in the extensive phragmites stands
which now cover the area.
Protests against filling had occurred as early as 1926, but the
land-making was roundly applauded by local boosters and real estate
developers. A main thoroughfare in the neighborhood of Marine
Park—Fillmore Avenue—immortalized this attitude. By the 1950s the
Brooklyn News was proudly declaring victory; the "desolate marshlands"
had been transformed. "Where millions of fiddler crabs, thousands of
muskrats and other marshland life once swarmed," it reported, "a
combination of garbage, refuse, and dredged sand has built up useful
recreational land."
Despite these assaults, the beauty of this resilient littoral was not
lost. An incursion of nature into the cast grid of the city, Gerritsen
is a relic landscape, a counterpoint to the artificiality of its
surroundings. The rolling hummocks wear a soft, wind-tossed mane of
reeds, and here and there thickets of aspen, sumac and bayberry
punctuate the scene. Ring-necked pheasants, descendants from flocks
released for a hunting estate in the nineteenth century, dart between
clumps of phragmites. Far off to the northwest the peaks of Manhattan
are surreal, the tilted bedrock of an alien world. The steady hum of
motors on the Belt Parkway recedes. The deep tide of time casts its spell.
As children we played in this ancient landscape, amidst the ghosts of
Canarsee oyster-gatherers, the Gerritsens and the slaves who worked
their land. We learned the contours of the inlet as if it were some text
of youth. Like the lost Jungle, it was here that the strictures of the
street-bound world grew slack. Here was a neglected scrap of
city-building stuff, beyond the tyranny of the city's streets.
The fringes of settlements host acts forbidden at the center.
Gerritsen's inlet became a dumping ground of stolen cars and abandoned
boats and the discarded dross of life. Teenage boys raced unmuffled
dirtbikes across the wet sand. On the east side of the water was a great
stack of concrete pilings, a recumbent Stonehenge on which we would
play. With firecrackers and pebbles we made primitive shotguns from
holes left by rusted-out reinforcement bars. Fuse lit, our tawdry
regiment would stand by and await the crack of makeshift artillery, the
plop of its stony load in the sea.
At Gerritsen we fished for snappers, the baby bluefish which moved into
the inlet in late summer, and netted schools of killifish and grass
shrimp, blueclaw crabs and barnacle-covered spider crabs. As the tide
receded, we would skip across the scattered rows of rocks, moving out as
far as we could before our footholds were lost beneath the sea-lettuce
and brine.
Landfill operations were undertaken all along Brooklyn's southern shore
to accommodate new development. Indeed, most of the neighborhood of
Marine Park was built on filled land. The old Stromme Kill, like many of
the creeks of pre-colonial Brooklyn, had been drastically shortened in
the early years of the twentieth century.
I became curious about the original course of the Gerritsen estuary. Old
maps showed a blue finger reaching far into the city, but without known
points of reference the precise lay of the old inlet was unclear. Other
maps, drafted in expectation of development, cast a spectral veil of
streets over the rural landscape. Many of these streets were never
built, but I began to realize that the Stromme Kill once flowed much
closer to my backyard than I had imagined.
Gerritsen Creek, view south from Avenue U, 1992
Photo by T. Campanella
On the north side of Avenue U a small park was built in the late 1930s.
It is a classic Moses park—ball fields, basketball courts, a red-brick
field house—designed by his design czar, Gilmore D. Clarke, the
landscape architect of the famous Westchester parkways. It became
evident that this park had been constructed directly on filled
marshland. Old photographs showed Avenue U—long assumed by us as
children to be the immutable edge of the city—as little more than a
causeway stretched across the tidal flats. Below the football players
and dog-walkers of Marine Park is a culvert that, in theory, still
carries the freshet which once thinned the salt water of the Stromme
Kill. The old stream thus once lay as far north as Fillmore Avenue. But,
as I was soon to find out, it had penetrated even further. And though
its waters were long dry, the ancient estuary had left a phantom of
itself in the stones of my neighborhood.
Just north of Fillmore Avenue are several blocks of two-story "garden
apartments." The buildings are unexceptional, save that they differ
considerably from the typical brick or clapboard row houses in the area.
On the next block north, this building type continues, although now
jogged over a bit to the west and only one block wide. An obscure New
York Times article from the 1940s confirmed my suspicions. These
buildings were developed years after the surrounding houses, on land
that was not as easily or cheaply built upon. This land was the route of
the old estuary. When property values rose high enough, it too was
filled in and built upon, but by a different developer and in response
to new market forces. That developer chose to construct on this
newly-available land not the single-family homes typical of the
surrounding blocks, but apartments. Where these apartments were built,
there once lay the creek. Here then was a masonry ghost of the Stromme
Kill, a specter of the ancient inlet in brick and mortar. The creek
lived on in the very monuments of the city which replaced it.
I now had a pretty good idea of the Gerritsen estuary's former self.
Following old maps, I continued north and came upon another revelation
of the old waterway—a street famous to us as children for its
steeply-sloping driveways (good for racing Matchbox cars). For a block
or two on either side of this street, the driveways also cant downward,
gradually becoming less noticeable as one moved further away. Here in
the incidental topography of a neighborhood was an echo of the long-dry
Stromme Kill. Further inland and therefore shallower and less wide,
enough fill had been dragged in when these homes were built to raise the
street level of the creek bed to that of surrounding blocks. To
economize, the backyards were left close to their original elevation. I
was now only a stone's throw from my house, behind the lot lines and the
clotheslines of our backyard.
I had wandered in search of one creek and found another, a Creek long
ago abandoned as lost: Gerritsen Inlet and the Lost Creek of childhood
were one and the same. I thought of Berkowitz, for here, twenty-five
years later, I had at last come upon his mythic littoral, with its tide
mill and waters which flowed both ways. The old man would have been amused.
Thomas J. Campanella is an urbanist, writer, and historian of the built
environment. He holds a Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, and was a Fulbright Fellow at the Chinese University of Hong
Kong. Campanella is a contributing writer for Wired magazine, and a
lecturer in the Department of Urban Studies and Planning at MIT. His
first book, Cities From the Sky: An Aerial Portrait of America, is
forthcoming from Princeton Architectural Press.
Originally published in the Fall 1996 issue of Terra Nova: Nature & Culture.
Terrain.org: A Journal of the Built & Natural Environments
www.terrain.org | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 1997-2004, Terrain.org. All rights reserved.
Copyrights for contributions are held by the respective author/artist.
Back